Understanding the Election of the President of the United States

You can download our article in PDF format by clicking on The button: Download PDF

Introduction: Background to the U.S. Presidential Elections of 2024.

Brief Presentation of the Issues.

The 2024 U.S. presidential election is an event not only for the United States, but also for the for the whole world. These elections come at a crucial time in the American history, marked by socio-economic challenges, significant political and environmental issues. The COVID-19, social and racial justice issues, tensions and climate issues are all issues that strongly influence the political landscape and electoral.
One of the major issues in this election is the management of the U.S. economy. In the context of a post-pandemic recovery, The president-elect will be tasked with stimulating economic growth while addressing the problems of unemployment and inequality. From Moreover, public health issues and access to care remain hot topics, especially because of the consequences of the pandemic on the health system.
At the international level, the United States' position on international issues issues such as climate change, relations with China and Russia, and conflict management in the Middle East, will be decisive. The foreign policy adopted by the next President will influence diplomatic relations and alliances
In addition, civil rights and justice issues including debates on racial equality, immigration, and the rights of women and LGBTQ+ communities, will continue to play a central role in the election campaign. The climate American politics, which has been polarized for several years, makes these elections all the more significant.

Comparison with Previous Elections.

The 2024 elections differ from previous elections in several ways. Aspects. First, they are taking place in the wake of the pandemic COVID-19, which has not only disrupted the daily lives of Americans, but also changed the methods of campaigning and political priorities. Unlike the 2020 elections, which were marked by through health restrictions and a massive use of voting by correspondence, those of 2024 could see a return to the traditional methods of campaigning, although the influence of the Digital technology and social media remains predominant.
Moreover, the political context of 2024 is shaped by the events and decisions taken during the previous mandate, particularly with regard to domestic and foreign policy of the United States. The actions and policies of the outgoing president, as well as key events that occurred during his tenure, such as the Supreme Court decisions, environmental policies, and economic reforms, have a significant impact on The direction of the debates and issues of 2024.
Finally, lessons learned from the 2020 elections, particularly with respect to concerns the security and integrity of the electoral process, are likely to affect voting patterns and the perception of the legitimacy of the results in 2024. Questions about the disinformation, voter turnout, and trust in the electoral system are at the heart of the concerns, which differentiates these elections from those that preceded them.

Part 1: Understanding the U.S. Electoral System.

The Fundamentals of the American Electoral System.

Structure and Role of the Electoral College.

The Electoral College is a fundamental component of the system The U.S. electoral system, which is unique in its structure and functioning. Designed as a compromise between electing the president by one vote Congress and a direct popular vote by citizens, the College is a mechanism that reflects both federalism and and representative democracy.
The Electoral College is made up of 538 electors, one number that corresponds to the total sum of the representatives and Senators in Congress, plus three electoral votes for the District of Columbia. Each state has as many electors as its representation in Congress, which means that representation in the varies depending on the population of the state. For example, the California, being the most populous state, has the largest Number of electors.
The primary role of the Electoral College is to elect the president and the Vice President of the United States. Voters meet in their respective states to vote after the general election, and The results of these votes are then sent to Congress for further consideration. Certified. This procedure underscores the federal nature of the process recognising the autonomy of the States while preserving a balanced representation system.

How the Popular Vote Works vs. the Great System Voters.

The operation of the Electoral College differs significantly from the direct popular vote. In the U.S. system, citizens vote for electors, rather than directly for the presidential candidate. These electors, in theory, vote then for the candidate who won the popular vote in their State. This mechanism is often a source of confusion and confusion. controversy, especially when a candidate wins the vote but loses the election because of the Electors.
The system is mostly "winner-takes-all", which means than the candidate who wins a majority of votes in a state wins all the electoral votes in that state. Only Maine and the Nebraska uses a proportional system, where the electors are awarded in part based on the results in each Electoral District. This structure can lead to situations where the outcome of the election depends on a few key states, the "swing states", which can swing from one party to another.
This part of the U.S. electoral system is often the subject of critics, with some arguing for reform in favour of a vote Popular direct. However, the Electoral College is profoundly enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, and any amendments would require a constitutional amendment, a complex procedure and rarely successful.

Designation of the Grand Electors.

Selection Methods in Different States.

The designation of the electors is an essential step in the the U.S. electoral system, and it varies considerably from one State to state. Each political party in a state submits a list candidates to become electors at conventions or through their central state committees. Those candidates are often chosen to reward their dedication and their service to the party. They can be political leaders long-time party activists, or individuals with close ties to the party.
In most states, voters vote for candidates in the general election, and in doing so, they vote indirectly for a list of electors associated with this candidate. The "winner-takes-all" is the prevailing rule, where the candidate who receives a majority of the votes in a state wins all the electoral votes of that state. That means that the selection of electors depends directly on the the result of the popular vote in each state. Exceptions to this rule are Nebraska and Maine, which use a proportional, allowing for a more representative distribution of Electors.
It is important to note that while the electors are theoretically free to vote for the candidate of their choice, the most states have laws that require them to vote for the candidate for whom they are committed. Cases of "faithless" electors" (unfaithful electors), though rare, have raised questions about autonomy and the role of the electors in the electoral system.

Role and Powers of the Grand Electors.

The main role of the electors is to vote for the President and Vice President of the United States. This Responsibility is exercised at the Electoral College, which meets after the general elections. The voting process for the electors is a formality in most cases, reflecting the result of the vote
The electors have the power to choose the president, especially in close elections where every vote counts. Ok that their role is widely regarded as ceremonial, they have the potential to change the outcome of an election, particularly if a A significant number of them decide to vote against the candidate for which they have committed, although this is extremely rare and often regulated by state law.
The electoral college system, although it is a key component of the The Federal Structure and the Checks and Balances System (checks and balances) in the U.S., is the subject of debate and criticism. Some suggest that it gives importance to the disproportionate to some States and does not adequately reflect the the will of the American people. These debates continue to fuel the discussion on electoral reform in the United States.

Historical Context and Evolution of the Electoral System.

Origins of the System.

The electoral system of the United States, with its Electoral College has its origins in the constitutional debates of the late 18th century. At the time, the Founding Fathers of the United States were faced with an unprecedented challenge: how to elect a leader in an unprecedented nascent democratic republic history to build on. They had to balance the need of a popular representation with the fear of a tyranny of the majority and respect for the sovereignty of States in a system federal.
The compromise reached was the Electoral College, a solution that reflects the U.S. federalist system and aims to balance power between the most populous and the least populous states. Populated. The Electoral College was designed to give a voice to each state in the electoral process, while preventing a Excessive concentration of electoral power in some regions densely populated. This structure also reflects a mistrust towards direct democracy, common among some of the Fathers founders, who feared that an uneducated population would be easily handled.

Major Changes and Their Impact.

Since its inception, the U.S. electoral system has gone through several major changes, reflecting changes in society and the political challenges of each era. Among the The most notable changes are the adoption of the 12th Amendment in 1804, which changed the voting procedure for the President and Vice-President after the controversial election of 1800. This change made it possible to separate the votes for these two positions, eliminating ambiguities and conflicts potentials.
During the 19th and 20th centuries, the suffrage movement Universal reform has led to important reforms. Gradual extension the right to vote for different groups, in particular with the 15th and 15th 19th Amendments, profoundly changed the composition of the the electorate. More recently, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a This is a key step in guaranteeing the right of minorities to vote, by African-Americans in the Southern States.
Another important aspect of the evolution of the electoral system is the ongoing debate on the relevance of the Electoral College in the modern. Voices are regularly raised to replace it with a direct popular vote, especially after elections where the Winning the national popular vote did not win the presidency. These debates highlight the tensions between democracy and democracy. representative and direct popular will, and raise questions about the questions about the fairness and representativeness of the current system.

Part 2: Step-by-Step Electoral Process.

Conduct of the U.S. Presidential Elections.

Voting Process, Including Early Voting and Correspondence.

The Voting Process in U.S. Presidential Elections is a complex and varied mix of methods, reflecting the diversity of and the size of the country. In the United States, the right to vote is governed by the both at the federal and state levels, resulting in a wide variety in voting practices. In addition to the day Held on the first Tuesday after the On the first Monday in November, many states offer Early voting and mail-in voting to facilitate participation electoral.
Early voting allows electors to vote in person before election day. This option has grown in popularity in recent years years, providing flexibility for those who can't afford to going to the polls on election day for a variety of reasons, such as work or health constraints. Early voting can be unfold over several days or even weeks, depending on the laws of each state.
Postal voting, on the other hand, allows voters to receive their ballots by mail and return them, or deposit them in designated places. Although this method has was originally designed for electors who could not be physically present, such as military personnel stationed abroad, Its use has expanded, especially due to the COVID-19. Postal voting has been a topic of debate with some seeing it as a more powerful voting method. accessible and safer, while others express Concerns about security and voter fraud.

Counting of Votes and Certification of Results.

Once the vote is over, the process of counting the votes begins. Votes. This process may vary from state to state, but it is usually carried out by local officials and supervised by representatives of political parties. The counting of votes, in for mail-in ballots, may take some time to time, sometimes leading to delays in the announcement of results.
After the votes have been counted, the results must be certified by the election authorities of each state. This certification is a crucial step in ensuring the accuracy and integrity of results. Once certified, the results are sent to the College electoral elections, where the electors vote in accordance with the results of their state.
It is important to note that, due to the decentralized nature of the of the U.S. electoral system, the process of counting and certification may be subject to challenges and appeals Legal. Differences in State Election Laws may also result in variations in the management of ballots and certification deadlines.

The Wait Between the Election and the Inauguration.

Reasons for Delay.

The wait between the U.S. presidential election in November and the Investiture in January is a unique feature of the system U.S. policy. This period, often referred to as the "Presidential transition", lasts about two months and has reasons History and Practices.
Historically, this time was necessary to give the big voters travel to the capital to vote, a a concern that dates back to the days when travel was long and Difficult. Although this reason is no longer relevant in the era the time limit has been maintained and is now codified in the U.S. Constitution, with inauguration set for January 20 by the 20th Amendment.
From a practical point of view, this period allows for a transition orderly and neat from power. The transition includes a multitude of tasks, such as appointing cabinet members, policy planning, and coordination with the outgoing administration to ensure a smooth transfer of power Clashes. This period is also essential for safety and the stability of the government, as it ensures a effective continuation of leadership and governance.

Activities of the President-Elect During this Period.

During the transition period, the President-elect and his team will meet focus on several key activities. One of the most important is the formation of the cabinet and the appointment of other senior officers Officials. These appointments are crucial because they define the direction and effectiveness of the future administration. The President-elect also spends much of this time in Plan your policy and agenda for the first few days and months of its mandate.
In addition to the administrative preparations, the President-elect commits often dialogues with national and international leaders. The purpose of these discussions is to build relationships and prepare for the ground for future foreign policies. It is also a period during which the President-elect may begin to implement implements its vision and priorities through declarations and commitments.
The transition is also a time for the president-elect to prepare for the immense responsibility of leading the country. This includes briefings on national security and other topics Reviews. These briefings are intended to ensure that the president-elect is fully informed of current issues and potential threats to national security.
Finally, the preparation for the investiture ceremony itself is an important part of this period. Investiture is an event symbolic and important, officially marking the beginning of the mandate of the new president.

Part 3: Influence of Political Parties and the Media.

Primaries and Candidate Selection.

Party Primary Process.

The primary process in the U.S. political system is a crucial and complex step in the selection of candidates for the presidency. Primaries are internal elections held by political parties, mainly Democrats and Democrats. Republicans, to select their candidate for the election Presidential. This process allows party members and, in fact, cases, to the wider public, to participate in the decision to who will represent their party in the presidential race.
Primaries are conducted in a variety of ways. Some of them are "closed primaries", where only registered members of the party can vote. Others are "open primaries", where everything Registered voters, regardless of party affiliation, may participate. There are also "caucuses", meetings of Party members who debate and then vote for their candidate favourite. These methods vary from state to state, adding to the the complexity of the process.
The primary calendar usually begins in February of the year of the election and spans several months, with states Iowa and New Hampshire playing an important role in voting early in the process. The results of these firsts can significantly influence the dynamics of the race, as they are often seen as indicators of the viability of a candidate. At the end of the primaries, the elected delegates During these elections meet at the National Convention of each party to officially nominate their candidate for the presidency. This convention is also an opportunity to define the and to bring together members and supporters in View of the general campaign.

Impact on the Presidential Race.

Primaries have a huge impact on the race Presidential. They are the first real test of the popularity and a candidate's ability to mobilize Voters. Strong or weak performance in the first few primaries can either propel a candidate to the forefront, or signal the end of his campaign.
In addition, primaries often shape the issues and themes of the the presidential campaign. Emerging questions and debates in primaries can set the political agenda and influence the candidates' positions. This means that the subjects that Primary voters' concerns can become central in the campaign for the general election.
Finally, primaries can also reveal divisions within parties. Internal power struggles and differences ideological issues that manifest themselves during the primaries may have a negative impact on the a lasting impact on the unity and strategy of the party to the general election.

Media and Polling Impact.

Role of the Media in the Formation of Public Opinion.

The media play a vital role in shaping opinion particularly in the context of elections U.S. presidential elections. With a multitude of communication - television, radio, print media, and now the digital platforms and social networks - the media have a profound impact on the way voters perceive candidates and understand the political issues.
Media coverage of election campaigns provides Voters Essential Information on Positions candidates' political backgrounds, and performance. The Reports, analysis, and televised debates shape the image candidates and can influence the candidates' public significant readers' perceptions and preferences. In the candidates, and their campaign teams devote considerable attention to the management of their image and communication with the media, seeking to maximize their visibility and appeal to the electorate.
With the rise of social media and online platforms, the The media landscape has become even more diverse. These new media provide candidates with direct and interactive ways to communicate with electors, while allowing for a information, whether accurate or not. The media social media platforms have also become arenas for public debate, where voters share and discuss issues and candidates; thus influencing the opinions of their peers.

Influence of Polls on Campaign Strategies.

Polls play a crucial role in campaign strategies presidential candidates. They provide data regular and detailed information on voter preferences, trends in public opinion, and receptivity to campaign. Campaign teams use this data to guide their strategies, including geo-targeting, political messaging, and advertising.
Surveys can also influence the perception of the "feasibility" of a candidate. Favourable survey results can generate momentum, attract support and funding and give a sense of viability and competitiveness. Conversely, low numbers can be a deterrent donors and undecided voters.
However, the reliability and influence of polls are issues that are debate. Survey methodologies, representativeness of samples, and interpretation of the data are often handed over Under consideration. Recent elections have shown that polls can sometimes lack accuracy, leading to surprises on the Election Day. This reality is prompting campaigns to balance their reliance on surveys along with other forms of evaluation and electoral strategy.
In short, the media and polls shape in a way that significant impact on the U.S. electoral landscape. They don't influence only on the strategies of candidates and political parties, but also on how voters perceive and respond to issues and candidates.

Part 4: Comparison with the French System.

Key Differences Between Presidential Elections in France and in the United States.

Voting Method.

The voting system used for presidential elections differs considerably between France and the United States, reflecting political traditions and electoral systems separate.
In the United States, the president is elected indirectly by the College a unique system in which the electors, rather than the The general population vote for the president. As Discussed previously, each state has a certain number of electors, proportional to its representation in Congress. Although voters vote for a candidate in the presidential election, they vote technically for a group of electors who, in their opinion, vote. This system can lead to Situations where a candidate wins the national popular vote but loses the election because of the distribution of the electors.
In France, the president is elected directly by the people, through a two-round majority voting system. If no candidate wins an absolute majority (more than 50%) of the votes in the first round, A second round is held between the two candidates who arrived in head. The purpose of this system is to ensure that the president-elect has a broad popular support, reflecting a more direct and of democracy.

Cultural and Political Influence.

The Cultural and Political Influence of the Electoral Systems of the France and the United States are deeply rooted in their histories and respective political structures.
In the United States, the Electoral College system is closely linked to the country's federalist tradition, where state autonomy and the balance between the populations of the different states are Key values. This structure influences the strategy of the campaigns Candidates often focus on "swinging" states" - key states likely to swing from one party to the next the other - rather than a unified national strategy.
In France, the direct election of the president favours an approach to more focused on the individual, with a particular focus on given to the personalities and programmes of the candidates. The political debates and media coverage in France tend to Focus more on policies and proposals candidates, as well as their suitability to represent the nation on the international stage.
In conclusion, these differences between electoral systems French and American are not just questions of but reflect political and cultural philosophies Separate. They influence the way campaigns are how candidates interact with voters, and the way democracy is expressed and lived in each country.

Part 5: From the Incumbent President to the President-Elect.

The incumbent president vs. the president-elect.

Definitions and Responsibilities.

In the U.S. political context, the term "president in office" function" and "president-elect" refer to two distinct phases in the the Presidential Leadership Cycle. The current President is the current Head of State and Government of the United States, who has taken the oath and performs all the duties and responsibilities of the presidency. This role includes the direction of domestic policy and foreign affairs, the command of the armed forces, the signing of the legislation, and the power of veto. The incumbent president remains in charge of these tasks until the official end of his mandate, which coincides with the inauguration ceremony of the new president.
The president-elect, on the other hand, is the candidate who won the presidential election but has not yet been officially announced invested. This period runs from Election Day to November until the inauguration in January. Although the President-elect did not There is no official power yet, this period is crucial for the planning and preparation for the future administration. The President-elect selects his cabinet, draws up policy plans, and participates in national security briefings. It can Also start building relationships with leaders and to articulate its political priorities to the public Public.

Transition of Power.

The transition of power from the outgoing administration to the new one is a fundamental aspect of American democracy. This period is characterized by collaboration between the current administration and the President-elect's team to ensure a smooth and orderly transfer of responsibilities. The Transition involves the transfer of critical knowledge, including National security information and details of operations Federal Government.
The quality and efficiency of the transition can have an impact significant impact on the new administration's ability to Govern effectively from the outset of his or her mandate. To facilitate this process, there is often close cooperation between the members of the outgoing Cabinet and those appointed by the President-elect, as well as between various officials and advisers.
The transition of power is also a symbolic moment, representing the stability and continuity of democracy American. The investiture ceremony, marking the end of this transition period, is not only a political event but also a It is also a celebration of democracy and respect for the principles of Constitutional.

Investiture Protocol.

Handover Ceremony.

The inauguration ceremony of the President of the United States is a solemn and symbolic event officially marking the Transfer of power from the outgoing president to the elected president. This The ceremony, rich in tradition and protocol, takes place on January 20 following the presidential election, in accordance with the 20th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is usually organized on the steps of the Capitol in Washington, D.C., although The location and nature of the ceremony may vary in depending on the circumstances and preferences of the President-elect.
The central element of the investiture ceremony is the oath of office administered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. United States. By taking the oath of office, the President-elect commits to "to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." That This moment officially marks the beginning of the new president.
The ceremony also includes opening speeches, prayers, musical performances and parades. The Speech The President's inauguration is an opportunity to express his vision and objectives for its mandate. Historically, these speeches varied in tone and content, reflecting the circumstances political and social issues of the day, as well as the personality of the president.
The investiture ceremony is also a public event, with thousands of U.S. citizens and distinguished guests in attendance to bear witness to this historic moment. It is widely disseminated on television and online, enabling millions of people to around the world to participate in this democratic event.

Historical and Political Significance.

The presidential inauguration is much more than a mere formality; It has great historical and political significance. She symbolises the democratic principle of the peaceful transfer of power, a pillar of American democracy. This ritual, repeated every four years, reaffirms the U.S. commitment to a constitutional government and the rule of law.
Historically, investiture ceremonies have been moments of national celebration and collective reflection. They provide an opportunity to mark the beginning of a new era and to bring people together the country after an often divided and controversial period of election campaign. In times of crisis or change, Investiture ceremonies can also serve as catalysts for national unity and healing.
Politically, the inauguration is a moment for the new president to address not only the nation, but also the world, setting the tone and approach of his presidency. It's a an opportunity for the President to articulate his vision and call for action and collaboration for the challenges ahead.

Part 6: Debates on Electoral Reform.

Electoral Reform Issues.

Current Debates on the Future of the Electoral System.

Debates over electoral reform in the U.S. are both wide-ranging and passionate, touching the heart of how the American democracy works and evolves. These discussions focus on on various aspects of the electoral system, ranging from the method of broader structures such as the Electoral College.
A central point of these debates is the relevance and the effectiveness of the Electoral College in the modern era. Advocates of the current system argue that it strikes a balance between the interests of States with large and small populations and maintains the federalism dear to the American political system. On the other hand, Critics argue that this system can sometimes lead to results where the elected candidate is not the one who won the vote popular, thus raising questions about representativeness and the legitimacy of the election results.
Another aspect that is often debated is accessibility and security of the vote. The issues of voter identification, voting and the modernization of electoral systems are frequently discussed, with differing views on the how to ensure both ease of access to voting and the integrity of the electoral process.

Proposals and Controversies, Such as the Abolition of the College Electoral.

One of the most controversial and discussed proposals is that the abolition of the Electoral College in favor of a voting system Popular direct. Proponents of this idea argue that it would make the electoral system more democratic and fair, by ensuring that every vote has the same weight, regardless of the elector's home state. However, such a reform would require a constitutional amendment, a process notoriously difficult and complex that requires broad approval in Congress and the states.
Other reform proposals include the adoption of alternative voting, such as ranked ballot or approval, which could potentially more accurately reflect voters' preferences. Similarly, debates on recutting electoral districts, known as the Gerrymandering, and its impact on equitable representation, are also in the foreground.
In summary, electoral reform issues are at the heart of the political discussions in the U.S., reflecting concerns on fairness, representativeness, and adaptation of the system to the realities of the 21st century. These debates will continue likely to shape the future of the American political landscape.

Part 7: Special Cases.

Exceptional Scenarios in Elections.

Contested Elections.

Disputed elections represent an exceptional scenario in the the U.S. electoral process, where the results of an election are formally questioned or challenged by one or more multiple candidates. These challenges may be based on Allegations of electoral fraud, irregularities in the count or legal problems related to voting procedures.
Historically, the U.S. has had several elections challenges, some of which have had major consequences on the national political landscape. A famous example is the election 2000 presidential election, where the Florida results were contested led to a U.S. Supreme Court decision and a finally determined the outcome of the election.
In such scenarios, several mechanisms can be put into action. works to resolve disputes, including recounts of voices, judicial investigations, and sometimes the intervention of the courts Awards. These situations can lead to political tension and test the robustness of democratic institutions of the country.

Electoral College Divided.

A divided electoral college is another exceptional scenario, where no candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes cast in the College necessary to win the presidency. This can be done produce in a multi-candidate system where the votes of the Electors are divided between more than two candidates preventing anyone from reaching the required threshold of 270 votes.
According to the U.S. Constitution, if no candidate wins the majority of the votes of the Electoral College, the decision to choose the The President returns to the House of Representatives, with each State delegation with one vote. The choice of the Vice-President, in this case, is decided by the Senate.
A divided electoral college is a rare event in history U.S. policy. The last case occurred in the 19th century, Highlighting the effectiveness of the current system in producing a winner clear in most elections. However, the possibility of a Divided Electoral College remains an intriguing facet and potentially disruptive to the U.S. electoral system, Especially in an increasingly polarized political climate.


Summary and Outlook.

Key Information Summary.

This in-depth analysis of the U.S. electoral system and its highlights the complexity and uniqueness of this democratic process. The role of the Electoral College, a a unique institution of its kind, with the nuances of primary and primary education. selection of candidates, the U.S. electoral system is a a mix of historical traditions and modern practices.
We looked at the fundamental differences between the vote and the electoral college system, emphasizing how this The latter can sometimes lead to discrepancies between the votes and the outcome of the election. The designation of the great Voter Counts, which vary from state to state, reflect the diversity and diversity of the Complexity of U.S. governance.
Debates on electoral reform, including the future of the Electoral College, show a political landscape that is constantly changing where issues of democratic representativeness and of equity remain relevant. Similarly, exceptional scenarios, such as contested elections and electoral colleges divided, although rare, are crucial aspects that test the resilience and robustness of the system.

A Look at the American Political Future.

Looking to the future, the U.S. electoral system continues to face challenges and opportunities. The way in which U.S. Addresses Issues of Electoral Reform, Management the growing diversity of its electorate, and the adaptation to the technologies and changing media, will define health and vitality of its democracy.
The political future of the United States is also intrinsically linked its ability to encourage broad voter turnout, and ensuring that every voice is heard and every voice is heard. Your vote counts. This includes addressing the challenges of accessing disinformation, and political polarization.
In conclusion, the U.S. electoral system, with its nuances and its complexities, is a vivid reflection of American democracy - A democracy that continues to evolve, adapt and respond to the needs of its citizens. Commitment to a process fair, transparent and inclusive electoral system remains crucial for the maintaining public confidence in the democratic system, and for the leadership of the country in the years to come.

Appendices: Anecdotes and Highlights.

Key Moments from Past Presidential Campaigns.

Notable Events and Controversies.

U.S. presidential campaigns, punctuated by stories and of significant events, are periods of great intensity political and social. These campaigns have often been the scene of notable events and controversies that have captured attention of the nation and sometimes changed the course of elections.
An emblematic example is the 1960 presidential campaign between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, best known for the former Presidential televised debate in American history. This debate has been held in the marked a turning point in modern politics, highlighting the importance of charisma and television presence. Kennedy young and dynamic, was widely perceived as the winner of the debate in the face of a less telegenic Nixon, thus influencing the outcome of the election.
Another notable moment was the Watergate affair during the Nixon's re-election in 1972. This scandal, involving Burglaries and an attempt to cover it up by the administration Nixon, led to Nixon's resignation and profoundly shook the The American public's trust in government.
More recently, the 2000 presidential election was marked by a major controversy during the vote count in Florida. The The extremely close margin between George W. Bush and Al Gore led to a manual recount and a legal battle that ended by a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, awarding Bush finally won.
The 2008 presidential campaign was also historic, with the election of Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the United States. United States. This election was marked by a strong mobilization and symbolized a significant moment in history U.S. Civil Rights Conference.
In 2016, Donald Trump's presidential campaign against Hillary Clinton has been fraught with controversy and defining moments, not least because of Trump's unconventional campaign style and Russia's alleged involvement in the election. The Trump's surprise victory defied most of the predictions of the United States. polls and political analysts.

The First 100 Days of Previous Presidents.

Significant Actions and Policies.

The first 100 days of a U.S. presidency are often considered a key indicator of the tone and direction that will take over the administration. This concept was popularized during the President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who launched a series of radical reforms to counter the effects of the Great Depression in the 1930s. Since then, the first 100 days have been have become a barometer of new administrations.
Under President John F. Kennedy, for example, the first 100 days were marked by the announcement of the initiative of the "New Frontier", symbolizing a commitment to space exploration and social progression. Kennedy also managed the war crisis. Bay of Pigs during this period, a defining moment in his presidency.
During the early days of Ronald Reagan's presidency, Emphasis has been placed on economic reforms, including the reduction of taxes and government regulations, laying the foundation for what would later be known as the "Reaganomics".
Most recently, Barack Obama signed the Economic Stimulus Plan, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, with the aim of countering the 2008 recession. This swift action was an example of the how presidents use their early days to Implementing policies that address national challenges urgent.
Under Donald Trump, the first 100 days saw a series of controversial executive orders, including the high-profile "Muslim Ban", which has provoked heated debates on immigration and security National.

2024 Expectations Compare.

Looking ahead to the 2024 election, the actions and policies of previous presidents in their first 100 years days will serve as a reference to evaluate the new administration. Voters and political analysts will be pay particular attention to the way in which the President-elect will address current challenges, including the management of the COVID-19, social justice issues, economic tensions and international relations.
Comparison of the first 100 days with the previous ones will assess the efficiency, timeliness and the boldness of the new president's actions. This will also provide a Overview of the President's Ability to Deliver on His Promises and to meet the expectations of the electorate in a Ever-changing political environment.